TC: Yeah, and he meant it that way. You can either approach things actively or passively and I think a lot of people can take it passively. Probably a lot of people that were there that day — they certainly all remember Warren, I don’t know how many would actually remember that comment — [but] how many actually acted on it? I don’t know.
是的,他确实是这样想的。你可以主动或被动地处理事情,我认为很多人可能会选择被动。那天在场的很多人——他们肯定都记得沃伦,我不知道有多少人会真正记得那句话——但有多少人实际上付诸行动了呢?我不知道。
There was a lot of fame around this “10,000 hour rule” that Malcolm Gladwell made famous[2], but actually it happened to have been a Florida State professor, K. Anders Ericsson, that came up with that. But the real point wasn’t the 10,000 hours — people became kind of stuck on that. To me, the point was active vs. passive [learning].
关于这个“1 万小时法则”,马尔科姆·格拉德威尔让它声名显赫[2],但实际上是佛罗里达州立大学的教授 K·安德斯·埃里克森提出的。真正的重点并不是 1 万小时——人们对此有些固执。对我来说,重点是主动学习与被动学习。
Whether you’re learning to play golf or you’re trying to get better at running or cycling or investing or whatever you’re trying to do, if you do it actively vs. passively, you pull those things forward and you create a tighter feedback loop on your mistakes and your learning process and it becomes more iterative. That’s what I took away from it, at least.
无论你是在学习打高尔夫,还是想提高跑步、骑自行车、投资或其他任何事情,如果你是主动参与而不是被动接受,你就能更快地进步,并且在错误和学习过程中形成更紧密的反馈循环,这样就变得更加迭代。这是我从中得到的收获,至少是这样。